Instructions: You are to interview two people and record their responses on this form. You should state their name and their comments to your solution to the identified problem.
VI. I interviewed two individuals to see what their response would be to my (our) plan. Their responses are as follows.
I intervied Cecelia Putnam, who thought this was a nice start to a solution. She liked how this solution addressed different levels of consequences for first time offenders and repeat offenders. She thinks that after the 3rd DUI they should not get their license back, because they should have learned their lesson already.
I also interviewed Kyle Reed who liked this plan.He also thinks that after the 3rd offense their license should be taken away for good. Also, if an intoxicated driver kills someone, even if it's their first offense, they should never be able to drive again.
VII. My (our) answer, based on our research, to their objections and concerns are
I agree with Ms. Putnam and Mr. Reed in that after the 3rd offense they should have their license revoked without question. After the 3rd offense the said presons obviously have some kind of problem that doesn't deserve any more chances to straighten up. They don't seem to want to make an effort to better themselves and avoid risking other lives. I agree with Mr. Reed about an offender having killed an innoccent human then they should be neglected of their right to drive again. Driving is a priveledge that not all persons can handle the responsibilities. Likewise,drinking is also a privelage that of-age people can enjoy, but that also comes with responsibilities and the two combined can't be handled by anyone. It's not safe to themselves or others.
Works Cited Putnam, Cecelia. Personal interview. 22 Feb. 2010. I interviewed Cecelia Putnam on her response to my proposed solution on making DUI penalties more strict. Reed, Kyle Jacob. Personal interview. 22 Feb. 2010. I interviewed Kyle Reed on his view points to my solution to make DUI penalties more strict
Instructions: You are to interview two people and record their responses on this form. You should state their name and their comments to your solution to the identified problem.
VI. I interviewed two individuals to see what their response would be to my (our) plan. Their responses are as follows.
I intervied Cecelia Putnam, who thought this was a nice start to a solution. She liked how this solution addressed different levels of consequences for first time offenders and repeat offenders. She thinks that after the 3rd DUI they should not get their license back, because they should have learned their lesson already.
I also interviewed Kyle Reed who liked this plan.He also thinks that after the 3rd offense their license should be taken away for good. Also, if an intoxicated driver kills someone, even if it's their first offense, they should never be able to drive again.
VII. My (our) answer, based on our research, to their objections and concerns are
I agree with Ms. Putnam and Mr. Reed in that after the 3rd offense they should have their license revoked without question. After the 3rd offense the said presons obviously have some kind of problem that doesn't deserve any more chances to straighten up. They don't seem to want to make an effort to better themselves and avoid risking other lives. I agree with Mr. Reed about an offender having killed an innoccent human then they should be neglected of their right to drive again. Driving is a priveledge that not all persons can handle the responsibilities. Likewise,drinking is also a privelage that of-age people can enjoy, but that also comes with responsibilities and the two combined can't be handled by anyone. It's not safe to themselves or others.
Works Cited
Putnam, Cecelia. Personal interview. 22 Feb. 2010. I interviewed Cecelia Putnam on her response to my proposed solution on making DUI penalties more strict.
Reed, Kyle Jacob. Personal interview. 22 Feb. 2010. I interviewed Kyle Reed on his view points to my solution to make DUI penalties more strict